The New Avant Garde

Contributors   Distribution   Interviews   Links   Press/Archive   Reviews   Samples   Staff    Submit   Subscribe/Back Issues

 

 

   

Lawrence Ferlinghetti.  Americus I.  New Directions Publishing Corporation, 2005. $14.95

Review by Tom Pynn

 

 

And there is no end no end to the doors of perception still to be opened and the jet streams of light in the upper air of he spirit of man in the outer space inside us

 

                                                                                                      Shining! Transcendent!

 

Into the crystal night of time

 

                              In the endless silence of the soul

 

In the long loud tale of man

 

                              In his endless sound and fury

 

signifying everything

 

                                          --Lawrence Ferlinghetti, from Americus I, XII

 

 

Since arriving on the San Francisco poetry scene in the early fifties, Lawrence Ferlinghetti quickly established himself as an important poet, publisher, and bookseller within the community of poets and artists collectively known today as the Beats.  Though the development of this literary movement of dissent that took American letters far beyond Walt Whitman’s dreams of a Vox Americana is more complex than this simplistic classification indicates, it remains that Ferlinghetti’s contributions were significant then and continue to be so today.  His establishment of City Lights Press and bookstore, gave a publishing outlet to the new artists developing FURTHER a new American literary voice on both coasts while simultaneously putting inexpensive editions of poetry into the hands and pockets of the reading public. Ferlinghetti's own artistic contributions began with his publication of Pictures from a Gone World (1955) and A Coney Island of the Mind (1958).  Since then Ferlinghetti’s voice has remained a clear bell calling attention to the nation’s promise and its failures. 

     

To summarize the past by theft and allusion

 

Americus: Book I may be said to mark the beginning of Ferlinghetti’s poetic project of composing an American epic. The pages in this first volume span the centuries from Ancient Greece to “Öld Europa” to the assassination of JFK as Ferlinghetti traces the development of Western man from Achaean into American.  It is also, in part, autobiographical which ties Ferlinghetti’s project to Whitman’s—And many were Whitman’s wild children--, Williams Carlos Williams’, and Charles Olson’s respective American idioms rather than depending upon, as Pound did, histories and languages not necessarily our own.  Composed in a variety of poetic styles and voices, it is a palimpsest of everybody’s past.  To summarize the past by theft and allusion not only is the volume’s opening line, but also reiterates Ferlinghetti’s poetics.  In all his poetic works he invokes the voices of western civilization’s cultural masters from poetry to painting to politics.   Yet he has done so in his unique style (though, at times, reminiscent of e.e. cummings’ irreverence) of blending the utmost seriousness, especially where his dissent with American values and actions is concerned, with an irreverent sense of humour. Americus I is a consciousness of felt life . . . The maze and amaze of life.  Indicative of his jazz-style poetics, the poems often move at the snap of a finger from Shakespeare to Lord Buckley. 

As the above implies, the book length poem depends heavily on remembering, but the act of memory as we all know seldom moves in a linear or even single direction.  Time is memory and memory is history and history is in flux: A poem is a phosphorescent instant illuminating time.  Hence, Ferlinghetti takes us from medieval Europe, to war-torn Poland to contemporary America in the span of a few short lines:

 

The labyrinth on the floor of Chartres Cathedral

and a Warsaw concerto heard distantly

on a Detroit mall

full of gumball goombahs on rollerskates

Cry of a black singer

in a beat-up Harlem bar

 

The poet’s lines often exemplify the jazz-style poetics that came into vogue after the end of World War II and continue to inform American poetics since then.  A voice developed not as Wordsworth considered as “emotion recollected in tranquillity,” but emotion recollected in emotion. The images in a poem should be jamais vu, not déjà vu.  As poetry that aims at presenting life as nearly as it can—a graph of consciousness at best—it speaks in a breathless tone that sounds like the catalogues of sights and smells and sounds of Whitman’s lyrical opus Leaves of Grass: All the images of / the splendid life of the world / down the rivers of windfall light.

 

No need to write a great epic

 

Having written above that Americus I is the beginning of Ferlinghetti’s American epic, what do we make of the line in book III: no need to write a great epic?  In Western literature, epic poems present us with grand narratives in which a hero born of noble lineage achieves a fiery but tragic apotheosis (and think of the countless hapless innocents who have the privilege of perishing in the wake of the heroic journey!) simultaneously elevating the kingdom/empire/state to Virgilian proportions.  There is also the standard catalogue of necessary ingredients that leave the reader with an image of a rarefied world without reference to ordinary or even everyday experience.  The modernist project of fashioning out of the fragments of western civilization “a usable past,” turns out to be as (un)usable as Virgil's Aeneid or Dante's La Divina Commedia. Pound’s Cantos, which Ferlinghetti considers one of the era’s “brave attempts at great epics,” are canti that couldn’t possibly be sung. . .  The Cantos his Commedia / a human comedy with little comedy. Pound’s (and Crane’s?) Modernist twist on traditional Western epics, lacks the extra dimension / of pure laughter.  Instead, Ferlinghetti invokes the voice of great rapper Homerwith tongue halfway in cheek-- to indicate the direction an American epic should take:

 

“Walt Whitman your greatest soul speaker

with his ‘barbaric yawp’

sounding for the first time

free from the past

the voice of the people of America

at once joyous and tragic

passionate and calm

intimate as a lover

 

An American epic, after modernism, will be a combination of comedy and tragedy (pace James Joyce), what Cornel West, in his appreciation of Whitman and Melville (Democracy Matters), calls “tragicomic hope.” Herein lies the democratic vista, the deep roots of democracy. Ferlinghetti, as do the Beats/San Francisco Renaissance/Black Mountain poets et al, opt for the kind of turn to an American epic as presented in Williams’ Paterson

 

in which he heard

the plash and eddy

the profane refrain

of American speech.

 

In Americus there is also Olson’s surgent MaximusO Gloucester—that takes to task those who would disobey the figures of the present dance, and does not shy from the bardic demand of taking the state to task in this foul country where / human lives are so much trash.  In addition to these important elements of an American epic, Ferlinghetti adds liberal doses of humour in case we get too serious.  Humour is the extra dimension that allows a fuller expression of the maze and amaze of life.  From Socrates’ “Ï drank what?" to Ferlinghetti's irreverent parody of Wordsworth's sonnet “The World is Too Much With Us Late and Soon,” as getting and spending / we lay waste our trousers; to a letter signed by J. G. Seemily, Public Affairs Officer; Ferlinghetti’s humour cracks open the smug privilege of stiff-lipped academic verse while bringing in the everyday idiom of contemporary America.

      For all of Pound’s erudition, the Cantos can only reach those few steeped in the histories of human culture; thus, they fail the test of a new American epic.  A poem, he writes, can be made of common household ingredients.  It need not be composed of esoterica only a handful (the cultural oligarchy) can understand.  Americus I stoops low to conquer and in doing so de-mystifies culture and poetry thereby allowing a democratic poetry to take shape, one that would give voice to the fullness of human experience, both joy and woe, and would not allow the power junkies and war mongers and their crimes to escape criticism by transforming them in the rarefied air of high culture.  As Kerouac invoked The Shadow and LeRoi Jones the Green Lantern in their respective works, so does Ferlinghetti include references to pop icons Charlie Chaplin, Seabiscuit, and rap music.  This is not to say that Ferlinghetti does not grant the hallmarks of American culture their respective places in his epic.  On the contrary, Ferlinghetti’s work has always been marked by an extraordinary litany of and allusiveness to Western icons such as Plato, Michaelangelo, Wordsworth, Joyce, etc.  In combining the remnants of high culture with common household ingredients, he demystifies the former and elevates the latter to effect a democratic inclusiveness that expands consciousness of life in all its manifestations.

It has been an on-going emphasis of the Beats to take back poetry from the fossilized academics and put it back into the streets where poetry, as Kerouac wrote in "The Origins of Joy in Poetry," can freely sing—wham bam the true blue song of man.  Poetry, Ferlinghetti writes in the book’s third section, is the shook foil of the imagination, the

 

Perpetual revolt against silence exile and cunning.

It is a guillotine for accepted ideas.

It is a lawless, insurgent enterprise.

 

To  write a Republic then—

 

How would an American epic sound if it doesn’t depend upon the stock elements of Western literature?  What would be the sound from the ground of poetry composed as insurgent art? Williams suggests that as Europeans came over from the old world, they should enter the new world naked, spring forth upon a new place. Instead, they opted for the same old conventions while simultaneously expecting things—politics, art, religion—to be different.  France and Germany in particular looked to America and men like Jefferson and Franklin to be the progress they envisioned.  For some this hope remains alive, but the history of America often belies such optimism. America has been and continues to be bedevilled by contradictions: America is both democracy and slavery. Ferlinghetti, like Whitman, Wolfe, Hughes, Kerouac, and many others sees America as the greatest experiment heralding the great promise.  Fulfilling this promise, however, is anticipated by asking and responding to the reciprocal questions who are we now, who are we ever?  Demon or bird? Ferlinghetti knows that America’s promise will not be fulfilled until we confront our history.  Until then, America hangs in mid-air.

As Mark Twain suggested when he had Huck light out for the territory, Americans are always searching and moving.  Never satisfied, we view life as an unfinished film, a naive optimism that as through the wrong end of a telescope we see the myriad antic figures forever disappearing over the far horizon As if the quivering meatwheel tape (we would like to think) could never break,

 

as if they would always be

full of light

made of light

shimmering

among the sere and yellow leaves

 

In the autumn of that year.

 

Where and who is Americus maximus? 

 

Take heed, take heed / all of you who still should be / the gadflies of the state

 

For Ferlinghetti, poetry has always been an insurgent art.  In the larger poetry scene in San Francisco even prior to the surge of new poetics after World War II, there was an inseparable mix of anarchist politics with poetry.  Kenneth Rexroth, poet-essayist and emcee of the now famous Six Gallery poetry reading, was one of the leading lights of what would become the San Francisco Poetry Renaissance.  As perpetual revolt, poetry is a guillotine for accepted ideas, it is a lawless, insurgent enterprise. It is the way a poet continues The great dialogue / that Plato began.  It is the last refuge of humanity in dark times.

 

      And the poet

      as the bearer of Eros

      as the bearer of love

      and pleasure and joy

      and total freedom

      must by definition

      be the natural born

      non-violent

      enemy of the State,

      which would eat

      your liberties!

 

Ferlinghetti knows first hand having been a Naval officer in the Splinter Fleet of mine sweepers during WWII and having seen the devastation of the atomic bombing of the Japanese people, that war is always INHUMAN WAR.  In the book's sixth poem, Ferlinghetti descries the 20th and 21st centuries' extraordinary escalation in the inhumanity of war--General says "Gettysburg Nothing Like This."  From WW I's mass slaughter of the youth of Europe to the current American regime's "Shock and Awe," the poet descries the Plague of Nationalism and exposes The Grand Illusion the Old Lie: Dulce et decorum est Pro Patria Mori!  It is neither sweet nor fitting that the young must die for their country. In truth, they die because of their country's insatiable hunger for more, their country's willingness to place the responsibility of governance into conscienceless boardrooms and soulless sanctuaries. War is always betrayal . . . Betrayal of the young by the old.

     

Is not some gross national happiness still possible?

 

Even as America ate its young, there still lingers the hope of a true American Awakening to come to birth from the wide womb of America, the great new spielmann to give America its voice. Bob Kaufman, Ferlinghetti's San Francisco Beat poet confederate, ended his poem "To My Son Parker, Asleep in the Next Room," with an acknowledgement of the unfulfilled promise of America.  He demonstrates the poet's non-violent and passionate commitment to our deep democratic roots:

 

On this shore, we shall raise our monuments of stones,

      of wood, of mud, of color, of labor, of belief, of being,

      of life, of love, of self, of man expressed

      in self-determined compliance, or wilful revolt,

      secure in this avowed truth, that no man is our master,

      nor can any ever be, at any time in time to come.

 

Americus I also speaks to this vision of hope: and there is a garden / in the memory of America / There is a night bird in its memory.  It is alive in the works of great American poets, with Ti-Jean Kerouac / on the banks of the Merrimac and all the others who have come, and gone, and will come again.  They are sounding the great promise / and the huddles masses / still longing for it / A bent Utopian dream / a kind of mirage over the horizon. 

 

A hopefulness without frontiers

 

We are all too familiar with the rhetoric of frontiers, a rhetoric masking the conquering lust that has driven us over the edge of humanity on countless occasions.  We know, too, that it has always ended badly for combatant and non-combatant--when did we ever take this distinction seriously? South of the border, And Cortes came, and

 

      North of the Border too

      Our God the greatest White Father

      told the white men under his command

      to take the Indians' land

      because that was their manifest destiny

      And they did then set forth

      with the great obscene hunger of

      the territorial imperative.

 

Even in the hopeful and visionary sounding rhetoric of Kennedy's new frontier of space exploration, there is a sinister hunger gnawing at our freedom.  The poet calls us to sanity, benevolence, and love by turning toward the things of this world.  The poet should see through world-colored glasses.  What does the poet see? The coils of longing myriad endgames of the unnameable.

      The poet calls us to see the same things he/she sees: Yet still endless the splendid life of the world

 

                  Endless its lovely living and

      breathing its lovely sentient beings seeing and hearing

      feeling and thinking laughing and dancing sighing and

      crying through endless afternoons endless nights

     

     

The hopefulness of an end to war is an important part of Ferlinghetti's vision: For there will be an end to the dogfaced gods in wingtip shoes and Gucci slippers in Texas boots and tin hats in bunkers pressing buttons.  In the endlessness of the unnameable there are no frontiers, no land and peoples to conquer with our lust, no war.  If the doors of perception were cleansed, Blake once wrote, every thing would appear to man as it is, infinite.  I think that Ferlinghetti would differ with Blake in that some of the doors have already been opened, and that there is no end to the doors of perception still to be opened.